/moe/

I saw the stuff about that one guy that someone asked grok to give them a plan on how to break into that some guy's house and rape them and in every step grok said dont actually do this its illegal

and also
publishing rape fantasies isnt illegal and doesn't really open you up to civil liability either
it's just gross

the only tort that comes to mind it intentional infliction of emotional distress and that has a huge bar to pass to get a case to actually stick
and even if you get the court to accept IIED
public figures have less rights
not strictly sure if it counts as parody but
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell comes to mind as something that would be cited

but also its probably just like
standard first amendment applies

>>1156389
yeah this is nothing