>>716251fuck technology i even need to type [spoiler][/spoiler] after post reference to prevent it from becoming a highlighted quote
why is most humans' technology is shit like that?
have you considered that it might not be the technology but the user
>>716256 My philosophical position on this is that such callings are two-way: "to a method" (or, more clearly, to people commending that method), any party who is intolerant to some aspects of the method is, instead, an "out-party", just like the method for the unsatisfied user is to be rejected
it is mutual dissatisfaction, and looking at it as to a symmetric relation is fine instead of taking poles